The Fall Part 10:
Heading 2
The FDA is the Enemy!!!
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has agreed to remove misleading statements about ivermectin, one of the early treatment medications proven effective against COVID-19.
In a recent settlement, the FDA conceded to remove social media posts and webpages discouraging the use of ivermectin for COVID-19 treatment. They have already taken down one page that falsely advised against its use, and within 21 days, they will remove another titled "why you should not use ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19."
The FDA to retract statements that undermined the use of ivermectin, a treatment that could have saved countless lives.
From the beginning of the “plan-demic,” we at AFLDS have known that ivermectin works well for both the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. Why? Because we followed the science. Study after study early in the “plan-demic” proved that ivermectin, with known anti-viral and anti-inflammatory properties, is a highly potent treatment against COVID-19. And when we began to see the Medical Industrial Complex lie to the world about its efficacy, we made sure millions had access to it.
The settlement marks a monumental win for medical freedom, reasserting the sanctity of the doctor-patient relationship and curtailing FDA overreach. But make no mistake, our battle is nowhere near its end.
Despite irrefutable evidence showcasing ivermectin's efficacy, the FDA obstinately clings to its stance against its use for COVID-19 treatment. Their settlement in this lawsuit reeks of a desperate attempt to maintain plausible deniability, fearing the exposure of the truth regarding ivermectin had the case proceeded.
This epitomizes the Medical Industrial Complex's insidious agenda—driven solely by profit and dominance. They are not allies of our well-being. Ever.
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
Dr. McCullough Delivers Message All Parents Need to Hear
“This childhood vaccine schedule is not what we thought... I’m telling you, in total, it doesn’t look good.”
The 1986 Vaccine Injury Act even admits vaccines come with “unavoidable harms.”
Five separate studies now show that “if children go natural, no vaccines whatsoever, they have the best outcomes.”
“When I was a kid, the rate of autism was one in 10,000. Now it’s one in 36,” Dr. McCullough explained.
“And there’s about 200 published manuscripts showing it’s immune system dysregulation.”
“And the vignettes, the mothers tell us that the child was fine up until the time they took multiple rounds of vaccines, and then they developed autism. Those vignettes are almost certainly correct. We can’t pin it down to any single vaccine. But I’m telling you, in total, it doesn’t look good. This epidemic of autism is a tsunami. And you know how many, many mothers now — [a] recent Kaiser Family Foundation survey shows about a third of mothers and young fathers going natural.”